|
Home Page
|
about CS
forums
editorialists
calendar
external
reading list
gallery
video
links
| |
CS Reports
|
Wal-Mart,
Kodak,
RFID Chips,
Defense Contractors,
Rand,
Nestlé,
Enron,
Monsanto,
malfeasance
| |
Editorials
|
GreenEarthAl,
Bulljivus,
Mike Niman
BigKidPants,
Richardson
Wanblee,
Feyler
| |
Ads
|

buy g.e.a.'s new novel
| |
Forums
|
Talk About Whatever
CS Poetry
Feedback
LinkPost
My Job Sucks
me vs. CorporationX
Commercials Suck
Neighborhoods
Paste it Forward
CS News
| |
Links
|
US Green Party
CorpWatch.org
Corp. Crime Reporter
CitizenWorks
PRWatch
The Corporate Library
GreenPeace
Democratic Underground
McSpotlight
AdBusters
ZNet!
CorporateWatch - UK
Counterpunch
Michael Moore
Guerilla News
IndiMedia
Population Connection
Reclaim Democracy
IWW
Organic Consumers
International Rivers
Tradewatch.org
|
|
 |
 |
"Who can take a sunrise.
Sprinkle it with dew.
Cover it with chocolate and a miracle or two.
The candy man.
Oh the candy man can.
The candy man can, cause he mixes it with love to make the world taste good."
-Leslie Bricusse - Anthony Newley
|
Corporations Suck Report: Nestlé
by Green Earth Al
March.08.2003
Nestlé is a multinational corporation that is nearly 140 years old.
It became known as a maker of milk and milk chocolate products but
now has branched out into many other industries including:
water (Perrier, Poland Spring), pet care(Ralston Purina, Alpo) and
Baby Foods (Nestlé babymilk, Very Best Baby)
CEO: Peter Brabeck-Letmathe
|
CS Disclaimer: This article is a mixture of facts and opinions.
Anything that is represented as a fact is a fact to the best of
my knowledge. Anything that is represented as opinion is my
opinion (which I am entitled to). I assert that nothing in this
article has been fabricated by me, I have no investments, long or
short, in this company and no motivation for writing this article
other than wanting to see corporations begin to put the best
interests of people before profits.
|
|
Corporations-Suck.com's report on Nestlé
Corporations Suck! Why do corporations suck? They suck because they have to.
And every year they suck more and more. There used to be laws. Some of the
laws may still exist somewhere but laws that aren't enforced may as well not exist.
These laws used to keep monopolies from forming in order to keep a balance of power
between the manufacturers and the consumers. There used to be still more laws and these
laws used to maintain a balance between workers and employers. All of these laws
have been quietly dismantled or arrangements have been made to make sure that they
are never enforced. Unions, where there are any left, have become toothless, powerless,
impotent and afraid.
Why do corporations suck? Corporations suck because in this hypercapitalistic
world "only the strong survive" and "it's a dog eat dog world out there". Corporations
are merging and acquiring at a phenomenal rate. Corporations have to be ruthless to
survive. Corporations that made their reputations and built their businesses on
serving the public in an ethical way are now at a competitive disadvantage. If there
is a recession, if times get tough, they have to either become more ruthless than
their competitors, or, more likely, they will just be gobbled up by a bigger, more ruthless
corporation that will sweep their morality right out the door and plug in their own
amoral standards.
Nestlé saw the writing on the wall a long time ago. They've been willing to step on
the backs of the little people for more than a decade and as their reward they have become
"the largest food and beverage company" according to their website. They have gobbled up
a lot of little companies, they have positioned themselves for future success, and they
haven't let little things like ethics and compassion for their fellow human beings get
in their way. They are well aware of how much money they have and they are confident that
if you have enough money, you can treat people any damn way you feel like and get away
with it. If a few people get mad, you just hire a public relations firm to clean up
your image. If you throw enough money at the problem, those few pesky people that follow
you around and actually care about what you do wrong can be greatly outnumbered by the
people who will watch your commercials, believe your projected public image, and continue
buying whatever you have to sell.
A quick visit to Nestlé's website would tell you a lot about how wonderful they are
and how much they care about the people of the Earth. According to Nestlé, their
"Business Principles... [have always reflected] the basic ideas of fairness, honesty,
and a general concern for people."
Well, I'm sorry, but I have to cry Bullshit! That is a lie. And if it would please
the court I shall present my evidence.
Exhibit A: Baby Formula
Do you have any children? If you have children do you love them? Do you suppose you
would love them any less if you were born in a "poor" country in Southeast Asia or
Africa or the Middle East? Would you want a nice big international corporation to
come give you misinformation that would place your baby at risk? If such a corporation
was found to have done such a thing... wouldn't you want them to stop it? Well, a whole
lot of people wanted Nestlé to stop it for a very long time. But Nestlé needed the revenues
so that it could climb its way to the top and it didn't need to be bothered by the safety
of a few babies in poor nations and a few whiny activists trying to sustain a boycott.
It all started back in the 70s (so I'm very glad I was born in the U.S.A. Nestlé didn't
get around to endangering American babies until the 1980s). See, once upon a time it was
just accepted fact that breastfeeding was healthier for babies. But corporations don't
make money from breastfeeding, they make money from baby-formula. Corporations benefit
when people start to believe that formula is just as healthy or even more healthy, and Nestlé
benefits most of all since it has dominated the world's baby formula industry for decades.
Nestlé found a really neat trick. Wanna hear about it? They discovered that they could give
out lots and lots of free samples of Nestlé baby formula in hospitals located in the poorer
nations around the world. They could accompany it with literature about how mothers of twins
or mothers suffering from malnutrition could place their babies in potential harm by trying
to breastfeed. Malnourished mothers and mothers of twins had only been breastfeeding since
THE DAWN OF MANKIND before baby formula was invented, but why bother with little details
like that. You can coerce people into buying things by playing to their fears. And who has
more fears than new mothers? And what's more, they weren't even trying to get the new mothers
to buy anything yet, they were giving the baby-formula away free. Nice of them no?
Perhaps not so nice after the mothers discovered that without continually breastfeeding
your mammery glands will dry up. If you use the free samples long enough you will have no
breast milk and no more free samples and now you will be FORCED to buy baby formula. That's
a pretty neat trick to play on impoverished women in poor nations while they're in one of
the most vulnerable times of their lives don't you think?
As an added bonus, the water in these poor nations is often unsafe so mixing the baby
formula with the local water supply subjects infants to a whole host of other dangers
like dysentery and diarrhea for starters. But I'm sure Nestlé would be glad to sell them
some bottle water to go with it.
It took about 10 years but the international community finally worked up a sufficient
outrage to get Nestlé's attention. There was an organized boycott of Nestlé products by
church groups, teachers unions and others. The World Health Organization set standards
regarding baby formula that would specifically address these concerns. But Nestlé was
undaunted. Baby formula made up a very significant portion of their profits and they
were going to do anything they could to ride this wave of profits to the top. Babies be
damned!
Nestlé hired some public relations experts: Rafael Pagan & Jack Montgoven and set out to
destroy the boycott. They found teachers and clergy that could be convened to join
their side and set out to divide and confuse the boycott. They made assurances that
they were now in full compliance with the World Health Organizations requirements and
eventually the boycott was dropped. Nestlé waited until the heat died down a bit and
then went back to the exact same practices. Except by the time the mid 1980s rolled
around they were trying the same trick all over the world in nations both rich and
poor. The boycott tried to reorganize but this time Nesté had time to prepare.
They hired additional public relations help from Ogilvy and Mather and began to collect
information on any group participating in the boycott. Apparently, spying on your critics
and buying enough of them off to manage this boycott thing is a lot more cost effective
than just not placing babies in danger in the first place.
Exhibit B: Nestlé Waters
There is a lot of speculation about the value of water in the coming century. You hear
things said like it will become more valuable than gold. To me, water already IS more
valuable than gold. If I don't get some form of water on a regular basis, I die. If
I don't get gold, well, who cares? This logic has not been lost on Nestlé which has been
trying to buy and control fresh water supplies around the world.
When I was a kid it was inconceivable to me that people would buy water when they could
get it for free from the kitchen sink. Now, everybody knows that you don't dare drink that
"free" water that comes out of the sink. And who benefits from that knowledge? Well,
the people that aren't drinking arsenic, lead, rust, and various unhealthy organisms, sure.
But also, the corporations that own Perrier, Deer Park, Poland Spring, Sanpellegrino, etc.
Actually, one corporation owns all of those. That corporation is Nestlé.
Here in the Great Lakes region there is great concern about corporations gaining access
to the water in the lakes. Already there is suspicion that big barges are sailing into
the great lakes with an empty hull, and leaving with a hull full of fresh water. There
is great concern that tributaries and aquifers will be drained and exported for sale elsewhere
as bottled water leaving water levels and wildlife greatly affected. The Michigan Citizens
for Water Conservation have taken Perrier to state court for its plan to pump out
more than half a million gallons per day from an aquifer in Michigan’s Mecosta County.
The battles to keep water where it is are just beginning and it's difficult to see where it
will go but I already don't like the way it's heading. Please keep a watchful eye on your
local fresh water supply.
Exhibit C: Sucks to Work for them Too
In 1989 workers in a Brazilian Nestlé chocolate plant tried to go on strike. They
were unhappy about poor working conditions. They complained about discrimination against
women, lack of protective clothing and inadequate safety conditions. Now, a big corporation
like Nestlé could (in theory) view striking workers as a sign that something is not right
and look at what the working conditions are and fix the problem. But NO! We wouldn't want
to give "third world" laberers the idea that they can start demanding fair working conditions.
That would totally send the wrong message. Much easier to identify who the trouble makers
and possible trouble makers are and fire the lot of them. After nearly 40 workers were fired
you can bet those laborers that were left wouldn't dare get so uppity as to demand any
fair working conditions.
Exhibit D: Too Mean? No such thing!
Ethiopia is one of the poorest nations in the world. It has continuing problems with
drought and famine due to lack of rainfall in recent years. Meanwhile, Nestle has been
enjoying record levels of profit year after year. Nevertheless, Nestlé saw fit to sue
the current government of Ethiopia because the former government of Ethiopia had seized
and nationalized a subsidiary of a company that Nestlé now owns. Naturally they didn't
own the company back in 1975 when the, again, former government nationalized it, but they
still feel they should sue the government and extract millions of dollars from a debt laden
nation facing mass starvation. How many millions? Six million dollars. And when the Ethiopian
government offered to settle for $1.5, Nestlé told them no way. Nestle makes billions
of dollars a year and would hardly notice the $4.5m difference but it was the "principle"
of the thing. They can't just let the former government get away with doing that to
a company that they didn't own at the time just because it would help to alleviate the
suffering of millions of people. What kind of terrible example would that set?!?
In December of 2002 the British newspaper the Guardian published a story on this
insanity. NOW all of a sudden Nestlé changes its mind. It has just agreed to
settle, and out of the goodness of their hearts they are willing to agree to disburse
the $1.5 million that they collect toward alleviating hunger in Ethiopia. Awww...
what sweethearts they are!
And back in the 1980s they totally didn't seem to
care about Apartheid in South Africa. While other corporations were bowing to
international pressure and divesting from South Africa, Nestlé kept right on
keepin' on with its South African Factories. Not only that, but they also were
so kind as to share their public relations strategies with the Shell corporation
(oil & gas) for how to keep operating in South Africa and confuse the public into
thinking it's an ethical thing to do.
Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury there's more. After all, what self-respecting
corporation would be satisfied with just practicing the evil arts by themselves.
Nestlé has or has had partial ownership in cosmetic companies like Clairol so
that they can participate in some cruelty to animals. They got together with
the other super villains in the Legion of Doom (you know: Monsanto, Cargill, ADM &
Kraft) to form the International Policy Council of Agriculture, Food and Trade.
That's the nice lofty-sounding group that helped influence GATT policy so that
gigantic food corporations could get around those pesky laws by holding private
trials that reduce international law to the lowest common denominator. Yes, it's
all in a days work to help bring you all of the genetically modified foods that are
on the horizon. But have no fear, I'm sure the Food & Drug Administration of the
U.S.A. will have some very reassuring words to say about how SAFE it all is
*wink wink* *nudge nudge*
I don't know how Nestlé's conduct is supposed to amount to "fairness, honesty, and
a general concern for people", but I don't want any part of it. So I ask you to
bring back a verdict of guilty, and impose a sentence of denying the bastards your
money. Buying Nestlé products will only contribute to more of the same.
-Corporations Suck. And Nestlé sucks BIG TIME!
- http://www.corporations-suck.com/reports/nestle.shtml
sources and further information:
Toxic Sludge is Good for You by John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton
http://www.mcspotlight.org/beyond/companies/nestle.html
http://multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/mm0392.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,862570,00.html
http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/sep02/80699.asp
http://www.great-lakes.net/lists/glin-announce/2002-07/msg00020.html
http://www.nestle-watersna.com/
http://www.nestle.com
Special thanks to David P. of the Erie County Green Party for his assistance.
Click here to comment on this report
Click here to read comments on this report
|
 |
|
|
| GBINet Sites: |




| | | | color codes: |
Color codes reflect how recently an item was added to this site | | = posted today | | | = 1 to 7 days old | | | = 7 to 30 days old | | | = older than 30 days | |
|
|